The comparison of two ads

Source: http://www.lasvegasonline.com/upload/Company/David_david%20copy.jpg
Source: http://ent.tom.com/dimg/2007/1022/img-558968884.jpg

Outline:

Top Sentence: Both ads are very attractive, but the ad that shows David dividing his body into two parts (B) is more striking than the other ad (A).

Main point 1: Description of both ads.

Main point 2: About A
Detail: background color, the flying flower

Main point 3: About B
Detail: background color, cutting his body into two parts

Concluding sentence: Therefore, ad B is more attractive than ad A because ad B makes people think that is really magic show.

The comparison of two ads

Both ads are very attractive, but the ad that shows David dividing his body into two parts (B) is more striking than the other ad (A). Each ad shows David plays tricks in the picture. Ad A shows David’s hands hold a flying flower but he does not touch the flower and nothing is between his hands and the flower. We can see only his head and hands; other parts of his body are hiding in the black background. Ad B shows David cut his waist and let his body become two individual parts and his hands hold his lags to keep his balance. Ad A is amazing because he it is not easy to let flower fly without anything help but in a second thought maybe something that is black really helps the flower flying. The background is black and we cannot see black tools help the flower flying. Ad B is very shocking because it is absolutely not a normal thing that a person cutting himself into two parts can still be alive. David does cut his body but he does not bleed. The background is quite bright and his clothes’ colors are different from the background. Those do not help him hiding tools. Therefore, ad B is more attractive than ad A because ad B makes people think that is really magic show.